My first non-fiction
book 'Irony - Evidence for God' will be published soon so it seems right to
blog about that.
Of all the evidences
for God to be found on the
Wiki page, you won't
find irony listed. In fact, historically, writers have used irony to argue
against the existence of God. Literary giants like Voltaire have used irony to state the alternative view. So, you could say,
at the very least, it's an original book.
The book was born out
of a growing conviction that the primary sustaining factor in my faith was
irony. That irony had become a kind of secret pain in so many chapters of my
life. A pain so intimate and seemingly-orchestrated that to see it as dumb luck
or coincidence was more unlikely than any other possibility. That it hinted at
the existence of God.
The book talks about
this in further detail and about the way God allows irony in all our lives. In
the book I call for a wider definition of the word in keeping with today's
understanding. Language evolves and for many people irony today is not the
strict dictionary definition. What if the real irony of Alanis Morissette's
iconic song was that the lyrics really were ironic after all?
Irony can be
hypocrisy, 'crazy bad luck' and even serendipity. And, to be honest, sometimes
'Crazy-bad-luck - Evidence for God' felt like a better title. But we live in
post-ironic, post-truth, and post-God times - we are far too sophisticated to
accept dogmas which we may have been expected to accept in the past.
If you understand,
observe and think about irony in your life you will realise that most ironies
are negative. So, to say that they are orchestrated by God is a big ask. It is
intellectually insulting (at least, if we are to believe that God is good) to
say that God has caused ironies to occur. Or worse than that, it is inhuman. So
you will be able to see the spiritual gymnastics I take in order to get God off
the hook for the bad ironies while still trying to defend human dignity or the
remains of my intellect. After all, isn't that what being a believer is about -
1001 ways to defend God even when all reason says he is to blame? Of course,
I'm trying to be ironic (or at least being disingenuous). How can irony be
evidence for a benevolent God? To find that out you may need to read the book.
Without being too
defensive, I'm anticipating a few possible reactions to my book. Firstly (and
most likely), I'm anticipating it to be largely ignored. There is a solace in
being an obscure, relatively unknown writer in that it means that I'm off the
radar of most critics. So, 'Wouldn't it be ironic to totally ignore this
diatribe?' is perhaps the most cruel criticism I face.
But there is also the
possibility of a considered counter-argument - that I have misunderstood
irony, that I have misunderstood God and that I have taken one too many
illogical steps in the formulation of my premise. An unreliable narrator can
safely be questioned. I think there are many holes in my argument, but I'm
willing to defend it.
Or a worse reaction
still, that the universe would have me subject to more negative irony for even
daring to write about the subject. Because that's how it all works isn't it? Or
that in pointing out God's apparent neglect I have somehow forgotten to toe the faith party line.
The book is written
for the agnostics, the seekers, the doubters, the skeptics. It is not primarily
aimed at believers or atheists (although I hope that these two groups would at
least find it interesting). It is not a very long book as I tend to write shorter
books, finding them easier to read myself.
I approached a handful
of publishers with the work but unless one of those who ignored me offers me a
contract too late (and that really would be ironic) I'm indie-publishing it
since I know the process so well. The most fun rejection I had from a publisher
was: ‘This is an interesting idea… clearly the Christian faith has plenty of
ironies to offer, but irony is not uppermost in the day to day life of the
church. I don't think our market would react with sufficient enthusiasm.'
The ironic thing is
that it is a book which can help you a little to survive day to day by making
progress towards a meaning to life, and pointing away from despair to hope.
Surely this helps people to survive (unless Viktor Frankl was wrong about all
that)?
However, you don't
really need this book. It won't resolve the issue of suffering. It won't make
you rich or make your tweets go viral. 'Why should I read it then?' I hear you
think.
Firstly, because, you
may want to know why everything is conspiring to keep you from reading it.
Secondly, because it's
original and brings some fresh ideas forward.
Thirdly, because it's
shiny?